County · code 47159
Smith CountyTennessee
Smith County is a county in Tennessee formed on October 26, 1799, from Sumner County, with its seat in Carthage.
- Founded1799
- County seatCarthage
- Named forDaniel Smith
- Land area314 sq mi + 11 sq mi water
- Population19,904 2020 Census
- Parcels mapped12,020 checked 14 October 2026
Where it is
Smith on the map of Tennessee
Tennessee has 95 counties and county equivalents, each with its own records office. Shapes with a page are links.
History
Formed in 1799 from Sumner County
An old deed may name a county that no longer exists, or a boundary that has since moved.
Smith County was created from Sumner County in 1799 and named after Daniel Smith. Over the following decades, Smith County gained and lost territory through multiple boundary adjustments, including the creation of Jackson County in 1801, Cannon County in 1836, and Macon County in 1842, with smaller adjustments continuing into the 1850s.
- 1799Smith County created Smith created from Sumner. · Tenn. Acts 1799, 3d assy., ch. 2/p. 179
- 1801Gained territory Smith gained from Wilson; lost to creation of Jackson. · Tenn. Acts 1801, 4th assy., ch. 48, secs. 1-2/pp. 281-282
- 1801Gained territory Smith gained from Non-County Area 2. · Tenn. Acts 1801, 4th assy., ch. 37/p. 270
- 1805Lost territory Smith lost to Jackson, lost to Non-County Area 5 when that part of Smith lying south of the Indian boundary reverted to non-county status. · Tenn. Acts 1805, 6th assy., 1st sess., ch. 67/p. 72
- 1836Lost territory Smith lost to creation of Cannon. · Tenn. Acts 1835, 21st assy., 1st sess., loc., ch. 33, secs. 1, 14/pp. 141, 145 and ch. 39, secs. 1, 6, 10, 12/pp. 163-167
Show all 58 changes
- 1799Smith County created Smith created from Sumner. · Tenn. Acts 1799, 3d assy., ch. 2/p. 179
- 1801Gained territory Smith gained from Wilson; lost to creation of Jackson. · Tenn. Acts 1801, 4th assy., ch. 48, secs. 1-2/pp. 281-282
- 1801Gained territory Smith gained from Non-County Area 2. · Tenn. Acts 1801, 4th assy., ch. 37/p. 270
- 1805Lost territory Smith lost to Jackson, lost to Non-County Area 5 when that part of Smith lying south of the Indian boundary reverted to non-county status. · Tenn. Acts 1805, 6th assy., 1st sess., ch. 67/p. 72
- 1836Lost territory Smith lost to creation of Cannon. · Tenn. Acts 1835, 21st assy., 1st sess., loc., ch. 33, secs. 1, 14/pp. 141, 145 and ch. 39, secs. 1, 6, 10, 12/pp. 163-167
- 1842Lost territory Smith lost to creation of Macon. · Tenn. Acts 1841, 24th assy., 1st sess., ch. 45, secs. 1, 19/pp. 56, 60
- 1844Changed Boundary between Smith and Macon confirmed (no change). · Tenn. Acts 1843, 25th assy., ch. 61/p. 73
- 1848Lost territory Smith lost two small areas to Dekalb to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1847, 27th assy., ch. 99/p. 149
- 1850Exchanged territory Smith exchanged with Jackson. · Tenn. Acts 1849, 28th assy., ch. 80, secs. 1, 11/pp. 261, 264
- 1850Lost territory Smith lost small area to Dekalb. · Tenn. Acts 1849, 28th assy., ch. 139/p. 341
- 1852Lost territory Smith lost to Dekalb to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1851, 29th assy., ch. 262/p. 429
- 1854
- 1858Lost territory Smith lost to Dekalb to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1857, 32d assy., pub., ch. 47, secs. 1-11/pp. 57-59 and ch. 83, sec. 3/p. 91
- 1858Lost territory Smith lost to Dekalb to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1857, 32d assy., pub., ch. 83, secs. 1-4, 8-9/pp. 91-93
- 1860Lost territory Smith lost to Wilson to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1859, 33d assy., 1st sess., priv., ch. 100, secs. 1-14/pp. 368-370
- 1860
- 1860Gained territory Smith gained from Putnam. · Tenn. Acts 1859, 33d assy., 1st sess., priv., ch. 196, secs. 1-11/pp. 575-577
- 1867Gained territory Smith gained from Putnam to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1867, 35th assy., 1st sess., pub., ch. 23/p. 24
- 1868Gained territory Smith gained from Dekalb to accommodate local resident; Smith gained from Putnam. · Tenn. Acts 1867, 35th assy., 1st sess., pub., ch. 82/p. 108
- 1869Gained territory Smith gained from Putnam to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1868, 35th assy., 2d sess., pub., ch. 20/p. 20
- 1869Gained territory Smith gained from Jackson and Putnam to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1868, 35th assy., 2d sess., pub., ch. 43/p. 64
- 1870Gained territory Smith gained from Putnam to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1869, 36th assy., 1st sess., pub., ch. 48/p. 62
- 1870Exchanged territory Smith exchanged small areas with Putnam (later overturned). · Tenn. Acts 1870, 36th assy., 2d sess., ch. 84/p. 133
- 1870Lost territory Smith lost to creation of Trousdale. · Tenn. Acts 1870, 36th assy., 2d sess., ch. 27, secs. 1-2, 4/pp. 47-48; Goodspeed [J], 843-844
- 1871Lost territory Smith lost to Dekalb to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1871, 37th assy., 1st sess., ch. 12/p. 10
- 1872Gained territory Smith gained from Trousdale when Tennessee Supreme Court declared Trousdale boundaries null and void. · "Macon and Smith Counties v. Trousdale County" in Tenn. Rpts. 61:1-11
- 1873Gained territory Smith gained from Putnam to accommodate local resident (later overturned). · Tenn. Acts 1873, 38th assy., ch. 66/p. 101
- 1877Gained territory Smith gained from Putnam to accommodate local resident (later overturned). · Tenn. Acts 1877, 40th assy., 1st sess., ch. 115/p. 138
- 1879Lost territory Smith lost to Wilson to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1879, 41st assy., 1st sess., ch. 61/p. 79
- 1881Gained territory Smith gained from Putnam to accommodate local residents (later overturned). Smith lost to Dekalb to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1881, 42d assy., 1st sess., ch. 142/p. 191; ch. 164/p. 220
- 1883Exchanged territory Smith exchanged with Putnam to accommodate local residents (later overturned). · Tenn. Acts 1883, 43d assy., ch. 99/p. 97
- 1887Lost territory Smith lost to Dekalb to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1887, 45th assy., ch. 53/p. 123
- 1893Lost territory Smith lost to Dekalb to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1893, 48th assy., ch. 20/p. 30; repeated in sec. 2, ch. 73/p. 91
- 1893Gained territory Smith gained from Dekalb to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1893, 48th assy., ch. 73/p. 91
- 1895Gained territory Smith gained from Putnam to accommodate local resident (later overturned). · Tenn. Acts 1895, 49th assy., ch. 98/p. 162
- 1895Exchanged territory Smith exchanged with Wilson to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1895, 49th assy., ch. 82/p. 125
- 1897Gained territory Smith gained from Dekalb to accommodate local resident; Smith gained from Putnam to accommodate local resident (later overturned). · Tenn. Acts 1897, 50th assy., ch. 263/p. 578; ch. 148/p. 335
- 1899Gained territory Smith gained from Dekalb to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1899, 51st assy., ch. 143/p. 253
- 1899Lost territory Smith lost small area to Dekalb to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1899, 51st assy., ch. 179/p. 354
- 1901Gained territory Smith gained from Dekalb to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1901, 52d assy., ch. 288/p. 653
- 1901Gained territory Smith gained from Macon to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1901, 52d assy., ch. 305/p. 689
- 1903Lost territory Smith lost to Dekalb to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1903, 53d assy., ch. 221/p. 491
- 1905Lost territory Smith lost to Wilson to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1905, 54th assy., ch. 47/p. 92
- 1905Lost territory Smith lost to Trousdale to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1905, 54th assy., ch. 86/p. 197
- 1905Exchanged territory Smith exchanged with Dekalb to accommodate local residents.with Dekalbwith Smith-Dekalb· Tenn. Acts 1905, 54th assy., ch. 88/p. 199; ch. 95/p. 206
- 1905Gained territory Smith gained from Putnam to accommodate local resident (later overturned). · Tenn. Acts 1905, 54th assy., ch. 370/p. 776
- 1905Gained territory Smith gained from Jackson to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1905, 54th assy., ch. 505/p. 1117
- 1913Exchanged territory Smith exchanged with Putnam when Tennessee Supreme Court overturned acts of 7 July 1870, 24 March 1873, 24 March 1877, 6 April 1881, 19 March 1883, 8 April 1895, 29 April 1897, and 13 April 1905.with Putnamwith Smith-Putnam· "Putnam County v. Smith County" in Tenn. Rpts., 129:394-397
- 1915Lost territory Smith lost to Wilson to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1915, 59th assy., priv., ch. 237/p. 915
- 1915Lost territory Smith lost to Wilson to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1915, 59th assy., priv., ch. 562/p. 1802
- 1927Gained territory Smith gained from Macon to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1927, 65th assy., priv., ch. 718/p. 2340
- 1931Gained territory Smith gained from Wilson to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1931, 67th assy., priv., ch. 673/p. 1834
- 1931Exchanged territory Smith exchanged with Wilson to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1931, 67th assy., priv., ch. 771/p. 2046; ch. 770/p. 2044
- 1935Lost territory Smith lost to Wilson to accommodate local resident. · Tenn. Acts 1935, 69th assy., priv., ch. 218/p. 505
- 1939Lost territory Smith lost to Wilson to accommodate local resident.to Wilsonto Smith-Wilson· Tenn. Acts 1939, 71st assy., priv., ch. 369/p. 1039
- 1955Exchanged territory Smith exchanged with Macon to accommodate local residents. · Tenn. Acts 1955, 79th assy., priv., ch. 55/p. 167
- 1965Gained territory Smith gained small area from Jackson. · Tenn. Acts 1965, 84th assy., priv., ch. 147, sec. 1/p. 525
- 1972Lost territory Smith lost small area to Trousdale. · Tenn. Acts 1972, 87th assy., 2d reg. sess., pub., ch. 713/p. 774
Land and parcels
What the maps cover in Smith
Who publishes each layer, how good it is, and when we last checked.
-
Parcels Good enough
Lot lines and tax-map numbers for 12,020 parcels from Smith County. Drawn for tax purposes: usually within a few feet of a survey, but not a survey.
edited 30 September 2024 · checked 14 October 2026 -
Address points Official
One point per address, 11,221 in all from TECB and local 911 districts via TNMap (tnmap_oir).
edited 6 October 2026 · checked 14 October 2026 -
Buildings Reference
Roof outlines traced from aerial imagery from FEMA Response Geospatial Office with Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Good for seeing what is on a lot; not accurate enough to set a fence from.
checked 18 October 2026
- Official
- from the office that keeps the record
- Good enough
- a reliable statewide or national copy
- Fallback
- a guide only; check the official record
- Missing
- nothing public found yet
People and land
Smith by the Census
Source: US Census Bureau, 2020 Census; US Census Bureau, 2020 Gazetteer Files. Not endorsed or certified by the Census Bureau.
Rules and offices
Smith County's official site
We have found the county's site but not its offices yet; start there.
County government
- County government
The official website of Smith County.
See your own lot on these maps
Open Smith County on Parcel Chart's free map and click your parcel. Save it with a free account; the full record of your place (site map, projects, documents) is Pro, in early access.
Questions
Common questions about Smith County
- When was Smith County founded?
- Smith County was founded in 1799, formed from Sumner County, and named after Daniel Smith.
- What is the county seat of Smith County?
- The county seat of Smith County is Carthage.
- Is there an online parcel map for Smith County?
- Yes. Smith County publishes a parcel map of 12,020 parcels, rated good enough here. You can click any parcel on it in Parcel Chart's free map, no sign-in needed.
- Has Smith County's boundary or name changed?
- Smith County was created in 1799 from Sumner County. Since then the Atlas of Historical County Boundaries records 56 later changes, most of them small boundary adjustments, chiefly involving Dekalb County, Putnam County and Wilson County.
- Is my lot in a flood zone?
- We do not have flood maps for Smith County yet. Look up the address on FEMA's Flood Map Service Center, which shows the effective flood map for any lot.
Nearby